OK. You want to take down the reigning ideology of the West. Big goal. How do you do it? The following advice will completely disregard the Constitution. We’re postliberals here, not liberals. *Strictly ban all forms of discrimination against Whites, men, the cisgendered, the non-homosexual etc. Don’t mention any other groups; they already have groups fighting for them. Hanania argues all one needs to do is simply to end civil rights law -this will completely fail, as “wokeness” comes from civil society, not from law. As even Hanania understands, even if it had its origins in civil rights law, it has become self-sustaining, and thus will remain just as severe in the absence of civil rights law. Despite my disagreements with Hanania, it is clear having the law on your side definitely helps. So make it explicit.
>*Support immigration from nonwoke countries and oppose immigration from woke ones.
This won't work. It will be in the interest of non-whites from non-woke countries to support wokeism, as the goal of wokeism is to deprive whites of their status and influence and give it to non-whites.
"as well as the Gay Germ Theory (explain why it’s implausible that a lack of desire for straight sex would somehow emerge on its own through evolution)."
FWIW, I'm not sure that the gay germ theory is all there is to it to male homosexuality. If it was, then we wouldn't be seeing the fraternal birth order effect for male homosexuality, with younger sons statistically more likely to be gay than elder sons are.
>*Support immigration from nonwoke countries and oppose immigration from woke ones.
This won't work. It will be in the interest of non-whites from non-woke countries to support wokeism, as the goal of wokeism is to deprive whites of their status and influence and give it to non-whites.
"as well as the Gay Germ Theory (explain why it’s implausible that a lack of desire for straight sex would somehow emerge on its own through evolution)."
FWIW, I'm not sure that the gay germ theory is all there is to it to male homosexuality. If it was, then we wouldn't be seeing the fraternal birth order effect for male homosexuality, with younger sons statistically more likely to be gay than elder sons are.