Today, nobody believes in Q (due to the abundance of Mark-Q overlaps) and practically every novice New Testament scholar favors the Mark Without Q hypothesis. However, is this hypothesis the one that fits the evidence best? Consider the difference between how Mark describes the temptation of Christ by Satan (from BibleGateway, NABRE):
Markan priority?
Markan priority?
Markan priority?
Today, nobody believes in Q (due to the abundance of Mark-Q overlaps) and practically every novice New Testament scholar favors the Mark Without Q hypothesis. However, is this hypothesis the one that fits the evidence best? Consider the difference between how Mark describes the temptation of Christ by Satan (from BibleGateway, NABRE):