Comments to my fighting wokeness article

The only real substantive comments I’ve gotten have been here (read the whole thread)

Svevlad, Dept. of Arrests & Executions @rexuniversalis

@Enopoletus Give me a moment - I will try to dissect that whole phenomenon, at least how I think it works. There's 3 types of Wokesters: the Innovators, the Repeaters, and the Instituters. The position on the woke hierarchy is inverse to corporate positions.

Unfortunately, the account was suspended a day later, and I failed to archive the thread. Such is life. The author described the process of the origins of wokeness (including repeaters such as Coates as “woke grifters”) and the importance of pressuring the institutors to not take the advice of the repeaters, as well as packing the courts with one’s supporters.

Some SSCer also claimed civil rights law could already be used for White people, though I don’t believe him:

https://astralcodexten.substack.com/p/open-thread-200/comment/3819776

All other comments were by woke people who don’t know they’re woke (or, just as without worth, comments by woke people who do know they’re woke). Most such comments thought any concrete action was worthless and the only course of action was to use magic to summon Bill Clinton 1996 back into existence. Of course, nobody paid attention when I pointed out to them opinions on homosexuality in 1996 in the U.S. looked like this.